View Source:
PackagesAndProcesses
!!!Keep Your Damn Process Management out of My Software Packages! bucking the conventions I hereby put the tk;dr at the top of the page, to save you time *tl;dr* USE DAEMONTOOLS Anyway, I get paid the aeron chair money to manage software releases for a giant internet company. We push packages out to thousands of servers on pretty much a daily basis. I've learned a few things about large scale software packaging along the way. Today's topic of discussion: process management. There's a natural tendency to conflate software packaging and process management. After all, if you install a package, you probably want to actually run the enclosed software, right? If this is a server then your software package is probably a service that describe why including process management in software packages is a terrible idea, suggest alternatives. http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Draft_Documentation/0.1/html/RPM_Guide/ch09s04s05.html http://www.debian.org/doc/maint-guide/ch-first.en. http://redmine.stbuehler.de/projects/debianserver/wiki/Daemontools http://code.dogmap.org./svscan-1/ zedshaw's procer: http://mongrel2.org/doc/tip/docs/manual/book.wiki#x1-410004
Please enable JavaScript to view the
comments powered by Disqus.
HollenbackDotNet
Home Page
Popular Pages
All Categories
Main Categories
General Interest
Geek Stuff
DevOps
Linux Stuff
Pictures
Search
Toolbox
RecentChanges
RecentNewPages
What links here
Printable version
AllPages
RecentChanges
Recent Changes Cached
No changes found
Favorite Categories
ActionPage
(150)
WikiPlugin
(149)
GeekStuff
(137)
PhpWikiAdministration
(102)
Help/PageList
(75)
Help/MagicPhpWikiURLs
(75)
Blog
(69)
Pictures
(60)
GeneralInterest
(44)
LinuxStuff
(38)
Views
View Page
View Source
History
Diff
Sign In